<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Search News &#187; blogmalware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchlogger.net/news/author/blogmalware/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchlogger.net/news</link>
	<description>Current Search News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 22:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Notes from EICAR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2006/05/09/427838.aspx</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2006/05/09/427838.aspx#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogmalware</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:427838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-US style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Hello folks. Jeff<SPAN class=250492107-09052006> Williams</SPAN>, Tony<SPAN class=250492107-09052006> Lee</SPAN>, Jigar<SPAN class=250492107-09052006> Mody</SPAN>, and I have returned from the <A href="http://conference.eicar.org">EICAR conference </A>in <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /><st1:State w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Hamburg, Germany<SPAN class=250492107-09052006>&#160;which,&#160;a</SPAN></st1:place></st1:State>s a port city with a similar climate<SPAN class=250492107-09052006>,</SPAN><SPAN class=250492107-09052006> reminded me of </SPAN><st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Seattle</st1:place></st1:City> (but with more bratwurst). The event itself was well-organized and, at about 100 attendees, was a great size to enable networking in a close,&#160;comfortable environment. What is especially nice about this conference is that it attracts and encourages&#160;students and professors so there was&#160;a great mix of professionals and members of academia. Especially&#160;for the academics, in some cases, this is the only antimalware event they will attend&#160;so it was great to see and interact with some new faces.</SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-US style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"></SPAN><SPAN lang=EN-US><?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p></SPAN>&#160;</P></DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3><SPAN lang=EN-US style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P></DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN lang=EN-US style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Similarly,&#160;I found many of the sessions presented to be unique and interesting. For example, a paper entitled "TTAnalyze: A Tool for Analyzing Malware" by Ulrich Bayer of Ikarus Software and Christopher Kruegel and Engin Kirda of the Technical University&#160;of Vienna presented some neat techniques for&#160;investigating malware behavior in an automated fashion. This paper&#160;was recognized as the best academic paper&#160;<SPAN class=250492107-09052006>by EICAR </SPAN>amongst a fairly competitive field.&#160;&#160;Also, while I'm slightly biased, I&#160;thought that Tony and Jigar's presentation on Behavioral Classification was excellent. The session was well attended and attracted some healthy discussion afterwards which continued ad-hoc through the remainder of the conference. With the permission of EICAR, we're pleased to be able to make Tony and Jigar's paper available from the <A href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=7B5D8CC8-B336-4091-ABB5-2CC500A6C41A&#38;displaylang=en">Microsoft Download Center</A>, so enjoy !</SPAN><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3><SPAN lang=EN-US style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt">&#160;</SPAN></FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3><SPAN lang=EN-US style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT>&#160;</P></DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN lang=EN-US style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Another interesting thread of sessions and discussions was on testing of anti-spyware applications. Both Larry Bridwell from ICSA Labs and Josh Harriman from Symantec offered presentations on this topic. Unlike the antivirus product testing and certification space, which is reasonably established, antispyware testing is still in its infancy. The number of different custom evaluations being conducted currently is dizzying with almost all offering different criteria. Microsoft is actively working with&#160;other entities&#160;in&#160;the security industry on making a set of more deterministic and reproducible evaluations. Along this vein, Jeff and <st1:PersonName w:st="on">Eric Allred</st1:PersonName> will be at the Antispyware Coalition (ASC) meeting in <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Ottawa</st1:place></st1:City> May 15-16, along with representatives from most of the other security vendors. If you have input into antispyware testing standards, I highly recommend you attend this event and chat with Jeff and Eric .... or reply to this blog post.</SPAN></FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN lang=EN-US style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"></SPAN></FONT>&#160;</P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN lang=EN-US style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Matt</SPAN></FONT></P></DIV><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=427838" width="1" height="1">]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2006/05/09/427838.aspx/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VirusTotal Participation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2006/04/28/426755.aspx</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2006/04/28/426755.aspx#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogmalware</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:426755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<P>Hi, this is Ziv Mador&#160;again from the Microsoft Anti-Malware team. This week, the folks over at <A href="http://www.virustotal.com">VirusTotal</A> added the Microsoft anti-malware engine to their service. VirusTotal is a free service that enables users to submit suspicious files to be scanned by several anti-malware engines. If you choose, files that are not identified as malicious are sent to the vendors who supply the anti-malware engines to this service to be analyzed. As of April 27, the Microsoft anti-malware scanner is included in the set of scanning engines used by VirusTotal. This scanner is based on the same technology found in Windows Live OneCare, the Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool, and Microsoft Antigen, and includes our full antivirus set of signatures. We are glad to be participating in this community opportunity.</P><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=426755" width="1" height="1">]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2006/04/28/426755.aspx/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the Road at Infosecurity Europe and EICAR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2006/04/26/426515.aspx</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2006/04/26/426515.aspx#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogmalware</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:426515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: blue; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><SPAN class=346051023-26042006><FONT color=#000000>Eric Allred and I are in London for the Infosecurity&#160;Europe conference. We spent the last two days on the conference floor with the Microsoft UK team, talking to customers and partners about <A href="http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/spyware/software/default.mspx">Windows Defender</A>, <A href="http://beta.windowsonecare.com/">Windows Live OneCare</A>, <A href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/solutions/security/clientprotection/default.mspx">Microsoft Client Protection</A>, and the <A href="http://www.microsoft.com/malwareremove">Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool</A>. We've also been demoing Windows Vista to customers which includes a number of new security features to help protect from&#160;malware, spyware, and potentially unwanted software including Windows Defender, <A href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/windowsvista/security/uac.mspx">User Account Control</A>, and <A href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/default.mspx">Internet Explorer 7 with Protected Mode</A>.</FONT></SPAN> 
<DIV><SPAN class=346051023-26042006></SPAN>&#160;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=346051023-26042006><FONT color=#000000>On Friday, we'll be flying to the <A href="http://www.eicar.org">European Institute for Computer Antivirus Research</A> (EICAR) conference in Hamburg. Jeff<SPAN class=125191100-27042006> Williams</SPAN>&#160;and two more of our colleagues, Tony Lee and Jigar Mody, will be joining us at this conference. Tony and Jigar will be presenting on Behavioral Classification on Monday, May 1. I've seen an early version of their presentation&#160;and it's some pretty interesting stuff.&#160;If you're planning to be at EICAR, please track us down and say hello ... and, naturally, come by Tony and Jigar's presentation on Monday.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=346051023-26042006><FONT color=#000000></FONT></SPAN>&#160;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=346051023-26042006><FONT color=#000000>Matt </FONT></SPAN></DIV></SPAN><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=426515" width="1" height="1">]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2006/04/26/426515.aspx/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Defender Beta 2 Refresh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2006/04/13/425175.aspx</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2006/04/13/425175.aspx#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogmalware</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:425175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<FONT size=2>
<P><FONT color=#000000>Today, we released a <A href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=435bfce7-da2b-4a6a-afa4-f7f14e605a0d&#38;displaylang=en">refresh of Windows Defender (Beta 2)</A> which includes updates based on the customer feedback that we have received through this blog and the&#160;<A href="https://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/spyware/software/newsgroups/default.mspx">newsgroups</A></FONT></FONT><FONT size=2><FONT color=#000000>. This update also addresses some issues that have been brought to our attention around signature updating, improves upon the usability of Windows Defender and also improves our SpyNet reporting capabilities.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT color=#000000>First off, we have added a checkbox option to </FONT></FONT><FONT color=#000000><FONT size=2>continually</FONT><FONT size=2> display the system tray icon. We heard you</FONT><FONT size=2>r feedback </FONT><FONT size=2>loud and clear on this one</FONT><FONT size=2>,</FONT><FONT size=2> so those who want to see our icon with the little green check in their system tray </FONT><FONT size=2>as a sign of system health </FONT><FONT size=2>can now do so. We have also improved Windows Defender's ability to report more accurate data </FONT><FONT size=2>about potentially unwanted software </FONT></FONT><FONT size=2><FONT color=#000000>through SpyNet so that we can help create better definition updates.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT color=#000000>Finally, we've made some minor updates to the UI and we are on track to release our Japanese and German localized versions and expect to turn on the update notification for existing Beta 1 and Beta 2 customers soon - so keep an eye out!</FONT></P><FONT size=2>
<P><FONT color=#000000>I would also like to urge you to opt-into the "Advanced" participation level in SpyNet. In this mode, you will not only be alerted of changes to critical system settings by recognized and potentially unwanted applications but you will also be notified of changes by applications that have not yet been classified. By choosing "Advanced" you can help combat spyware by sending back full reports and potential samples to our analysts.</FONT></FONT><FONT color=#000000><FONT size=2> To the extent any personal information is included in an "Advanced" member report, this information will not be used to identify you or contact you in accordance with our <A href="http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/spyware/software/privacypolicy.mspx">privacy policy</A></FONT></FONT><FONT color=#000000><FONT size=2>. </FONT><FONT size=2>For </FONT><FONT size=2>example, under the </FONT><FONT size=2>"Basic"</FONT><FONT size=2> setting, </FONT><FONT size=2>the SpyNet report will</FONT><FONT size=2> strip off the path to an executable </FONT><FONT size=2>it</FONT><FONT size=2> found, in case it was in a folder that contained your user name</FONT><FONT size=2>; however, </FONT><FONT size=2>knowing where </FONT><FONT size=2>potentially unwanted</FONT></FONT><FONT size=2><FONT color=#000000> applications install is useful information. Thank you for helping us fight spyware and potentially unwanted software!</FONT></P>
<P></FONT></FONT><FONT color=#000000><FONT size=2>With these upcoming changes to our reporting network and our core technology, we </FONT><FONT size=2>will </FONT></FONT><FONT size=2><FONT color=#000000>improve our detection and removal capabilities even more in the upcoming months.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT color=#000000>Thanks,</FONT></P></FONT><FONT color=#000000 size=2>
<P>Adam</P></FONT><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=425175" width="1" height="1">]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2006/04/13/425175.aspx/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News on Alcan, Mywife.E</title>
		<link>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2006/04/03/424113.aspx</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2006/04/03/424113.aspx#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogmalware</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:424113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<P>In Bill Gates' keynote at RSA in February, one of the subjects he spoke on was the ability for Microsoft to have a comprehensive view of the evolving threat landscape using the information and feedback from such tools as Hotmail, Watson, the Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool, and Windows Defender.</P>
<P>Each month, the Malicious Software Removal Tool runs on approximately 250 million computers, mainly via Windows Update and Automatic Updates. In February's release of the tool, we added the ability to detect and remove a worm called <A href="http://www.microsoft.com/security/encyclopedia/details.aspx?name=Win32/Alcan">Win32/Alcan</A>. We believed that Alcan would be moderately prevalent based on data from Windows Live Safety Center and Windows Live OneCare but we were genuinely surprised once we sifted through the data from the February release. During the course of that month, the tool detected Alcan (and, specifically, Alcan.B) on just over 250 thousand unique machines, easily the top detection for the month. Compare this to the <A href="http://www.microsoft.com/security/encyclopedia/details.aspx?name=Win32/Mywife.E@mm">Win32/Mywife.E</A> worm (aka CME-24), which we removed from approximately 40 thousand computers in February.</P>
<P>Alcan.B does not exploit any software vulnerabilities. Instead, it spreads through popular peer to peer applications and its prevalence is likely due to effective social engineering. Specifically, when sharing copies of itself over a P2P network, to name the copies, it contacts several websites to look for the names of recent, popular program cracks. Thus, the worm's name is always relatively up-to-date and attractive&#160;to those surfing these networks for cracks. Also, when the worm is run, instead of displaying nothing or popping up 50 browser windows, it displays what appears to be a setup wizard window, as displayed in our <A href="http://www.microsoft.com/security/encyclopedia/details.aspx?name=Win32/Alcan">write-up</A>. When the user clicks next, an error message is displayed. Thus, the user is fooled into thinking that what he or she just ran was a buggy or incomplete program, not a worm.</P>
<P>Threats like this reinforce the idea that malware that exploits user weakness can be as dangerous as those threats which exploit software vulnerabilities and reinforces the value of up-to-date antivirus products as well as general user vigilance.</P>
<P>Matt</P><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=424113" width="1" height="1">]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2006/04/03/424113.aspx/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Defender Beta 2: Updated Version Available</title>
		<link>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2006/02/21/420156.aspx</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2006/02/21/420156.aspx#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogmalware</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:420156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<P>An updated version of Windows Defender Beta 2 is now available from the <A href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=435BFCE7-DA2B-4A6A-AFA4-F7F14E605A0D">Microsoft Download Center</A>. This update resolves the two issues described in the below blog post relating to non-English versions of Windows and referenced in <A href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/915087">KB915087</A>.&#160; If you are running on a non-English version of Windows, then we advise that you uninstall the previous installation and install the updated version.&#160; <STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000>If you are running on an English version of Windows, then no action is required.</FONT></STRONG></P>
<P>Also, a new definition update package is now available from Microsoft Update which should resolve the problem described in <A href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/915105">KB915105</A>.&#160; Users with Automatic Updates enabled will be notified of the availability of the release in a manner consistent with their Automatic Updates settings.</P><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=420156" width="1" height="1">]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2006/02/21/420156.aspx/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Defender Beta 2: Update</title>
		<link>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2006/02/16/419794.aspx</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2006/02/16/419794.aspx#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blogmalware</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:419794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<P>Hi all,</P>
<P>We’ve gotten some great feedback from places like this blog and our <A href="http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/spyware/software/newsgroups/default.mspx">support newsgroups</A> about the recently released Windows Defender Beta 2. We really appreciate the enthusiastic participation!</P>
<P>Some of this feedback has allowed us to identify a couple of problems with our setup on non-English versions of Windows:&#160; </P>
<UL>
<LI>We have a problem installing on systems which don’t have a group named “Users”. On these systems, the group typically exists but it is in another language. </LI>
<LI>Sometimes the link to Windows Defender creates a new group called “Programs” at the top of the start menu. </LI></UL>
<P>Our international users are very important to us and so we are currently testing an updated version that fixes these issues.&#160; That update will be available soon through the same links where you installed the original version. Until we make this version available, users may follow the steps in <A href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/915087">KB915087</A> to workaround these issues and successfully install Windows Defender Beta 2.</P>
<P>Another problem that was appearing in the newsgroups: </P>
<UL>
<LI>Uninstalling and reinstalling can temporarily cause problems updating signatures. </LI></UL>
<P>This will automatically get fixed in the next update of our signatures, which is scheduled for Tuesday. Please see <A href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/915105">KB915105</A> for more information.</P>
<P>Finally, we have also received a few questions about the tray icon. A consistent point of feedback from Windows users is that there are just too many icons that appear in the system tray.&#160; With this in mind, we decided not to display a system tray icon for Windows Defender if no action is needed.&#160; This way, we can help the industry move towards a model where the items in the system tray are programs that need a user's attention instead of items that are simply running.&#160; As always, your comments on this are welcome.</P>
<P>Thanks again for all the support and please keep the feedback coming !</P>
<P>Adam<BR></P><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=419794" width="1" height="1">]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2006/02/16/419794.aspx/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
